Hello GHM. Can u please direct me to the post where I suggested getting loads of players in because I cannot recall suggesting such a thing. I may, like a number of others on here, commented on the fact that players were required to fill a a few positions in the team AND like a number of others, expressed their disappointment that that wasn't done and we started the season half cocked because of that. Bodge and I appear to agree on that one. And I have never asked for DGs head,just complained that starting to look good after about 12 games makes progress to the top 5 or 6 extremely difficult.
And as for asking people to suggest names of prospective managers, well that's like asking how long is a piece of string, you don't know until it has been measured, Graham Drury is evidence of that. Mr Newton is no fool but he was suckered in by that one. For three seasons we have started half cocked, even in the trenches during the First World War soldiers learnt very quickly not to strike two matches in quick succession.
It's interesting how many wannabe prospective managers come out of the woodwork when a job is advertised, that is when suitable names can be suggested, when the list is formulated, so let's stop asking for suggestions for names, it's statement used to try and shut people up.
To qoute you , "Just a thought but when other teams are changing players in order to improve their chances is it logiacal to keep the same team that the others know about "
Odin with only 8/9 players retained your criterior demanded some more must go .
Which of those 8/9 would you have moved on ?
Working on your plan this would mean bringing in at least 12 more players to build a squad of only 18 .
I consider 12 "a load" of players to bring in at one go .
A few on here like yourselve seem obsessed with a fling start to the season . The reason some are more laid back like myself is being awhere of the fact in lower leagues some early leaders find they have to unload players mid-season . Better safe than sorry .
Now regarding naming prospective managers in your related long history lesson above, as I see the only relevent content was the " piece of string ". A load of meaningless gabble just to try and "string " us along . :dan
With the suggested Greene shortcomings you come up with I am certain like any other displeased fan
you have considered an alternative you would like to see him replaced with .
Don,t be shy , tell us .
