121
The B-Ark / Re: Dudfield is back
« on: August 15, 2011, 10:06:04 PM »I think, highlighted in the last two posts, we are missing something here. Pearson and Church would not have been on a kings ransom yet they are/were clearly better players than their pay-grade suggested.I don't disagree with your comments.We are all aware we were getting great value out of Church and Pearson and replacing them with like for like would have been virtually impossible.For what it's worth i am happy with the majority of the new signings,midfield looks o.k.,particularly with Danny Sleath yet to come back.However i would ask you,and others for that matter,if you think we have replaced lets say SWD and/or Kieran Murphy with players of equal or similar ability??.I personally don't think so.My point was that according to the Chairman we could break even but still provide the managers with a budget
To take a drop, however slight, will mean that this years squad will have to go some to match the same level of overall quality. It might yet, we will only know come 10/15 games in possibly longer?
After watching him for the first time on Saturday Holsgrove has the quality and the potential to be worth more than Church/Pearson especially as in the main forwards command better fee's etc.
competitive enough to again go for promotion-i'm not sure that's so given the lack of quality in a couple of areas.It's not necessarily the budget i'm questioning-it's perhaps more the way it's been spent.